As the American League gets ready to announce its Most Valuable Player shortly, I wanted to offer a (hopefully) unique perspective.
In addition to voting for “Value” to mean a player’s value to his team, let’s also incorporate his financial “Value” as well. For instance, a player making 15 million dollars per year should be roundly castigated in the press if he is not on the list of M.V.P. candidates every single year, while a guy making $400K, who is matching the high-priced prima donna tit-for-tat, should be regarded as being much more “Valuable”.
Anyway, it has long been a dream of mine that salary should count for something in the MVP voting. I know it’s a pipe dream, and I also know that a bunch of writers, usually the last guy picked all their lives and now drunk on power, vote for these things. That is why it all too often devolves into a popularity contest. I would love to see some of these younger writers use the huge audiences they have now with TV (I am talking to you, Buster Olney) and take a stand against the status quo. Ignore whether or not the guy is likeable, or even tolerable, and make your decision based on what matters…was he the player in the entire league with the most value over the course of 162 games?
Yeah, I know…another pipe dream. OK — let’s get on with it. Here are the numbers:
Read the rest of this entry »
Popularity: 11% [?]